Drum Pad Redux: Offworld Percussion

Several years ago, in the early days of the pandemic, I came into a couple of used pads from Offworld Percussion. The first pad, an Invader, wasn’t my thing. Designed by and for drummers accustomed to marching with high-tension Kevlar snares, the hard black rubber was very responsive, but felt jarring to my hands, accustomed as they were to Mylar heads with lower tension. The pad was well-made, with Offworld’s patented “Darkmatter” poured into a hard plastic shell that acts as a very stout rim when the rubber sets. But it was also very heavy for a rubber practice pad, and I tripped over it more than I actually used it.

The second pad, an Invader with a blonde gum rubber surface, was more to my liking, but it was also heavy, and redundant with several other pads I had at the time.

Eventually, I sold them both, and moved on.

Fast forward to now. I had an opportunity to consider Offworld pads again, thanks to a guy in central Oregon wanting to sell a Tapspace pad, and also thanks to a gum rubber version of the BYOS pad that went on sale. Over a period of about a month, I was able to buy the used a Tapspace pad and the BYOS pad, plus a couple of pucks to insert into the BYOS pad.

Here’s the Tapspace pad. I bought it used at a significant discount, and it cleaned up nicely. The rubber feels similar to that of the V3 rubber pad I’d had five years ago, but because this is a singlesided pad it weighs far less and is easier to manage. Plus, it comes with a small oval of hard Darkmatter so you can have different playing surfaces on one side. The feel is responsive without being mushy, and I like i a lot.

The underside of the pad has a fiberboard base and an outer ring made from recycled rubber. The rubber is playable, though not large enough to be practical. (More recent versions of the V3 with Darkmatter come with a bottom fully cover with this recycled rubber, instead of the entire pad being Darkmatter top and bottom. It’s a lighter pad than the earlier version, and while I appreciate that I still don’t think the Darkmatter pad is for me.)

Last year, I’d fitted a heavy platform to a marching snare carrier so that I could carry a practice pad on the march, as part of my physical therapy for dealing with Long Covid.  The setup worked well enough, but the metal platform alone weighed over eight pounds. Adding a pad to that made whole thing very, very heavy. I decided I’d need to research a lighter weight solution. 

At first, I tried a Offworld Visitor pad, with a lighter weight attachment available from Offworld that attaches to the J hooks on a snare carrier. The pad was small (with an 8” gum rubber playing surface) and very lightweight, but not exactly what I was looking for. 

So I turned my attention to the larger BYOSphere pad, which was designed in partnership with the BYOS crew who play and teach on high-tension Kevlar drums. It was first made with Darkmatter, and optional laminates could be purchased. More recently, the BYOSphere pad was offered with a gum rubber surface (for which laminates would not apply). 

The BYOSphere pad, like the Visitor pad, comes with a hollowed out section underneath. This recess accepts various magnetic “pucks” and other accessories that allow for different sound effects and for use on a stand or with a knee strap. (These pucks also fit the pads in the Aurora series.)  when I installed the BYOSphee pad on the carrier attachment, I was pleased that it fit exactly the way I’d hoped, and at the proper distance from my carrier.

Obviously, you can’t use the sound effects pucks at the same time you place the pad on the marching attachment or on a stand; but on a tabletop or another pad these sound effects are a lot of fun. I chose the two different sound effects (snare and shaker), and the dampening puck, to cover everything I might need.

The pucks that a pad can rest on come with threads for either an 8mm thread, or a 1/4” thread. I got one of each, the former for the marching carrier attachment and the latter for an old cymbal stand.

They work like a charm, though you do need to be careful not to get carried away with your rimshots.

The “snare” pad consists of tambourine jingles embedded into it, with an adjustable center washer to allow for more or less vibration when struck. (There’s also a shaker puck filled with metal ball bearings, that sounds very different from the “snare” puck.)

I’m pleased with how all my purchases and experiments have turned out. I’ve kept the Visitor pad, and for now it sits on my cymbal stand puck. (I don’t know if I’ll keep it but for now it’s small and handy.)

I use the BYOSphere pad on the marching carrier, and also on a flat surface. 

Offworld has the Aurora series pads and pucks, as well as the various versions of the larger V3 pad, available at their web site. The Tapspace version of the V3 pad is available directly from Tapspace, which also sells drum instructional materials.

Happy drumming.

Vintage Corner: Sam Ulano’s King Size Pad

Sam Ulano was a jazz drummer and drum teacher based in New York. He wrote and published many instruction books that are still in use today, and one of his quirkiest claims to fame is the one gig he played for the band PiL (Public Image, Ltd, with John Lydon before he founded the Sex Pistols).

Sam taught numerous drummers over a fifty year period and designed his own practice pads and practice sticks. His sticks were made from sections of metal conduit, and were designed for use on heavy rubber practice pads. You can find a couple of his pad designs in YouTube videos, like this one.

(Photo stills, enlarged, from the video)

Note the construction and size of the pad, with gum rubber set into a panel atop a blue wooden box.

I’d assume the handle is for ease of carrying, and that the box is hollow for resonance (though perhaps a drawer could be opened on one side to store a lesson book). I’ll need to research further to find better photos and information about this particular pad.

In other videos, Sam is shown playing on a big, flat pad. Here’s a photo still of that style of pad, taken from another video (with low production values, but you can still see the pads he and his student are using).

I acquired one of the flat styled pads this week in an online sale. This pad had previously been offered by another seller, at a price I couldn’t afford at the time. Six months later, it showed up for sale again, this time from a seller of random vintage items. I watched the listing for another six months and finally made him an offer that we could both live with. 

The pad is well used and probably dates from the 1960s or 70s. 

The top side is a panel of thick, pure gum rubber, of the kind available between the 1940s and 1960s, inset into a wood frame. It has a great feel even now, but the rubber has disintegrated with use and time. If I play on it, tiny crumbs of dried rubber flake off. I’m researching a way to preserve the rubber and make it safer to play without damage.

The bottom side of the pad has a much harder black panel of rubber that resembles the stuff found on the earliest versions of the HQ Real Feel pads. It has rebound, but is much harder in feel and tone.

The whole thing is supported by a thick wooden frame that measures around 13” x 11”, with playing surfaces measuring 12” x 10” — making for a very big practice pad.

I’m very glad to add this to my collection of vintage pads. I’m hoping to stabilize the gum rubber so I can use the pad regularly. Stay tuned.

CB700 snare drum: an underrated gem

Although I’ve pared down my drum holdings considerably, I still hold a place in my heart for CB700 drums from the late 1970s and early 1980s, the period of time when I was in high school. CB700 drums were a common fixture in many school band rooms back then, because they were solidly built and affordable by school districts. For awhile, CB700 drums and parts were made in the same factory as Pearl drums, but their manufacture jumped around a bit over several decades. The latest generation of CB drums were made in Taiwan, and then in China.

The CB700 drums came with beautiful lugs that came to be called “wristwatch” lugs for their shape. The center of the lug was finished with a shiny panel that came in silver, blue or red, with silver being the most commonly available. 

I acquired this CB700 snare drum a couple of years ago, put it in the closet and promised I’d get to work on cleaning it up. I finally pulled it out last month. I took it apart, tightened all the bolts, cleaned up the shell and the lugs and replaced the heads and snares. As I went around the lugs, I noticed that some of them were missing the polished aluminum dots. 

I reached out to a friend who’s a CB drum enthusiast and collector, and asked him where I might find some replacement dots.

He cheerfully replied that he’d be happy to send me some. He apparently knows how to cut them from aluminum sheeting, and polish them in the process so the polished side shines. He had a bunch and slipped some into an envelope. They arrived a few days ago, carefully wrapped in blue painters tape and sealed in a cardboard sleeve. He advised me to clearcoat the shiny side to protect them before installing them.

The weather here had been quite cold, so I thanked my friend and advised him I’d have to wait until it warmed up enough for the paint to dry.

Yesterday, the temperature warmed up to the high 50s, so I laid out the dots on the tape, sprayed a light clearcoat and let it dry overnight.

This morning, I applied the new dots to the bare lugs using a tiny drop of super glue for each one. They’re dry now, and the drum is complete. And beautiful.

Not bad for a drum that cost me twenty bucks.

Adventures in Unsustainability, Part 150: "Made in China" means we don't have to look behind the curtain

I know, I can sometimes be like a harpy screaming into the wind on this stuff, but if it didn't matter I wouldn't make such a fuss.

Drummer buys the newest version of the Carlos Botello signature pad, made in China and branded for Salyers Percussion (who, if you remember, doesn't actually make any of their own products).

Takes delivery, opens box and discovers that the pad has been wrecked already. 
He's paid almost $100 for the pad including postage, and is understandably annoyed.

He shares his experience on social media and in less than a day, the owner of the company jumps on and promises he'll make it right.

Suddenly, other drummers are hopping on, singing the company's praises and talking about what a standup guy the owner is.

If that's all we ever see, fine.

But this business model actually encourages consumers to not look behind the curtain, to not ask how the sausage is made. And this is why it's such an insidious thing.

The pads are made in China now, probably by Hanflag, which makes pads and other drum products for more companies than I care to list here. They are made in the thousands and shipped to music stores around the world, starting in the USA because that's where the real madness about marching-forward pads first took off and remains huge.

Because they are now mass-produced in such great quantities, it's no big deal from a consumer standpoint if a pad arrives damaged. Simply call the company, send photos and ask for a replacement. When the pad is made in such large quantities, there's no need to send the actual pad back, and that's probably the case here. It's a simple matter to replace it by pulling another off the stack in the warehouse. Customer gets replacement pad, which is probably okay, and he's happy. He and his buddies will continue to laud the company, boosting their image and their sales.

Fine. But what happens to the damaged pad?

That's probably up to the consumer.

If he's handy, he could remove the rest of the damaged soft rubber rim and even replace the silicon surface with something else, and keep or give away the repaired pad to a kid who's short on funds.
That's certainly what I'd do.

But very often, the truth is that nothing happens to that original practice pad. If the buyer is asked to bring it back to the retailer, the retailer will make some notes, arrange for a refund from the company, and very likely toss the pad in the dumpster.

Do you see where this is going?

Salyers and their ilk don't care.
They don't have to care, because they are having their pad mass-produced as fast as possible so they can sell them hard to as many drummers as possible.

But go wide-angle with me for a moment.

The marching arts activity is popular with high school and college-aged young people. But it's not exactly growing exponentially right now. School budgets have been slashed, music teachers have been laid off and music classes have been cut from the curriculum in nearly every state in the country. Overseas, the marching arts are very popular now in places like Japan, China and the Phillippines. But they are generally making their own drums and accessories. School bands exist in Africa too. But in places that have seen a lot of political and material disruption, kids are practicing on homemade pads, or simply on blocks of wood. They're not laying out a hundred bucks for a high-zoot pad from the US.

Add to that the disruption to the marching arts movement here in the US, with DCI trying desperately to reboot a shrinking and increasingly expensive summertime activity, families struggling to keep up (or quitting because they can't afford to send their kids back), high schools throughout the country resorting to marching in old uniforms and using old instruments because that's what they can afford to do.

What you see on YouTube and TV, and in wealthy suburbs with a solid tax base, are the cream of the crop, and make up a very small segment of what's really happening in school band programs across the country.

So at what point does it no longer make sense to mass-produce practice pads that will fall apart because they were cheaply made to begin with?

The whole thing has gotten really, silly, and really sad.

And that is why I lost interest in most modern, marching-forward pads. They don't represent reality, and they actively discourage the more mature thinking that is required of people living on a rapidly heating planet. 

Eighty years ago, our grandparents who drummed practiced on wood blocks with a hunk of rubber glued on top. They focused on technique and chops. They got good. 

Sixty years ago, Remo Belli made a practice pad with a Mylar head that felt a lot more like a real drum. It's what I and many other drummers of my generation learned on. By today's standards it's considered junk, but in reality it was such a good pad that Remo is still manufacturing them -- and their replacement heads -- today.

Thirty-five years ago, fancier rubber-on-wood and rubber-on-fiberboard pads entered the market. THe earliest models were not much different than their WWII forebears, except that they were the size of a drum head so you could practice zones. Zones had become a thing for marching snare drummers. Those pads weren't horribly expensive when they first came out. But as DCI drum lines grew more visible and more famous, suddenly more young drummers wanted to use the same pads those drum lines used, and the beginning of the marching-forward pad market was born.

Today it's out of control in many ways and for many reasons. You can read why in my earlier posts.

I've been selling off most of my modern marching pads. Unless they were craft made in the US, I've mostly lost interest in them. And although I may be shooting myself in the foot here, I secretly hope that there will be a great shaking out of companies selling Chinese-made pads while discouraging consumers not to look behind the curtain. We now live in an age where we can't afford to perpetuate so much willful ignorance without sacrificing our environmental and human future.

Stop worrying about whether your pad is "cool" or not. If you need a practice pad, buy it used or make your own.

Just drum on something. Make noise. Make rhythm. 

Make music. 

 

Comparing old and new: Ludwig P-359 and Volkwein’s Tom’s Pad

I have a fondness for tunable pads, particularly the old Ludwig P-359 (8”) and P-360 (10”), and I’m also a fan of the Tom’s Pad from Volkwein’s Music. The former was at its height of production from the late 1960s through around 1980. Tom’s Pad went into production around ten years ago, long after the demise of the Ludwig models. 

I had an opportunity to obtain a second Tom’s Pad today, and when I brought it home, I immediately took it apart. I did so because this pad came with a Ludwig-branded head and I wanted to see if it was the same as the old heads from the Ludwig pad.  Tom’s Pad comes with a specially-branded head made by Remo, and is meant to take Remo practice pad replacement heads. The Remo head will not fit on an old Ludwig pad because the hoop of the heads differs in width and depth.

I have pieces of an old Ludwig P-359 pad on hand and would like to replace the very worn head that came with it. Since Ludwig no longer makes parts for these older pads, it’s a bit of luck to find parts that can be swapped in.

I took the Tom’s Pad apart, and discovered that the construction is nearly identical to that of the P-359. The only meaningful difference is in the metal rim.

As you can see from the photos, the components are nearly identical. The foam insert for the Ludwig pad is slightly thinner, but still curves down towards the edges like the thicker insert from the Tom’s Pad.

The other difference is that the hardware for the newer pad is a thicker Allen bolt that screws into threaded receivers in the base,w hole the hardware for the P-359 was an odd, over-engineered design using threaded bolts that were pressed into the base from underneath, and square nuts (which fit a standard drum key) screwed on from above to tighten the rim and head against the base. On both pads, a smaller wooden disc sits under the head and above the base, the foam rubber and head held in place above that by the rim and bolts. 

In both cases, only the pressure of tightening the bolts held everything together. (This is not unlike the approach used in Beetle Percussion’s “Last Pad,” the double-sided design of which I reviewed earlier. I will receive the single-sided version of the pad for testing and review closer to Spring.)

The hoop of both Ludwig heads is nearly identical, which tells me that they would both work on the P-359 pad. However, the Tom’s Pad came with a lot of wrinkles in the newer Ludwig head, and I suspect that may be due to having been stretched over the thicker foam rubber at pressure. When I reassembled the Tom’s Pad, I tensioned it a bit higher than it had been when I brought it home. it didn’t remove the wrinkles entirely, and if I keep this pad I’ll probably replace the head with a Remo practice pad head, which should lay better at tension. I’ll probably set aside the newer Ludwig head as a possible replacement for a P-359.

I decided to see if I could discern any meaningful difference between the response of a P-359 and the Tom’s Pad with the Ludwig head.

Obviously, with this Ludwig pad being at least fifty years old, the head is a little worn and I don’t want to crank it too tight. 

Then, I compared it with the Tom’s a pad with the Remo head.

Volkwein’s offers replacement rubber inserts and heads for the Tom’s Pad. Their replacement heads are embossed with Volkwein’s logo. If you don’t want that, a regular Remo practice pad head should fit just as well.

While comparisons are often made between the Volkwein pad and old Reno tunable pads, the Remo pad base uses a plastic bottom with a deep recess designed to hold foam rubber, with the head stretching over the recess. The result is that the Remo pad sounds hollower — and louder — than the Tom’s Pad.

In truth, the design of the Tom’s Pad is much closer to that of the old Ludwig P-359/360 pads, and in my opinion it’s a design that produces a better tone and feel. 

The Remo pad of the 1960s and 70s holds a special place in my heart because it’s the pad I began learning on. But the sound of that pad grated on my parents’ nerves, and successive generations of students were encouraged to find something else to practice on as soon as they showed they were serious about continuing with drums. I keep a few Remo pads in my collection to this day, but welcome play on them now. The Ludwig P-259 and 360, on the other hand, are in regular rotation on my practice pad stand. They’re solid and feel great. The Tom’s Pad also sees some chopping time. 

I’ve written to Volkwein’s Music a few times asking — imploring, really — that they consider making this pad in  10” size. Now that I have a better understanding of its design, I can see why they’ve kept with the 8” size. Still, I can dream.

Tom’s Pad is available from a Volkwein’s Music for a retail price of $85 plus shipping. It’s well-made and will last a long time with care. The Ludwig P-359 (8”) can sometimes be found used online, though in varying degrees of condition. The P-360 (10”) shows up far less often, and sells for far more because it’s the more desirable size among collectors and players alike.

When drumming is an act of love and justice

If I were forty years younger I’d consider doing something like this.

God bless him.

Old Cooperman? Maybe. I just don’t know.

Hanging out with some sticks I acquired several months ago.

After researching both my memory and knowledge of some of my drum brothers, I wonder if these may be some very old Cooperman sticks.

I had a pair very nearly the same size and shape over thirty years ago, made of boxwood. I cannot for the life of me remember who I got them from. They were much heavier, too heavy for my hands at the time, and felt even more rigid and unforgiving than these do. Of course, I was a different drummer long ago and it’s possible that my hands are simply better able to manage a more rigid wood than before. I eventually traded those boxwood sticks to another drummer. I regret not having them now, at least for comparison’s sake.

A couple of fellow drummers suggested they may have been made by someone named Hollowedel, though I haven't yet been able to find anything on that name in my online research. I’ve reached out to Patsy Cooperman Ellis at Cooperman Drums to see if she might recognize them.

The weight stamped on the butt end of each stick does not exactly match what my electronic scale indicates (My scale says they weigh 72 and 73.5 grams, respectively).

But on a tuneable pad, they feel lovely.

I’m asking around among my fellow drummers who are more knowledgeable about old sticks, to see if I can nail down a maker and era. 

Chopping here on my Eviction Pad from Loyal Drums. (I swapped in a Remo Emperor head for the Loyal custom fiber head and muted the pad so I could use it indoors while Sweetie is home. 

If anyone recognizes these sticks or has a pair like them, and can definitively identify a maker and age, please reach out by commenting below. I’d be grateful. Bonus points if you can tell me what wood you think was used (though I know that’s tough without seeing and handling them in person).